Driving Change—Literally
Electric vehicles are known for cutting emissions and shrinking carbon footprints. But experts are now highlighting another critical benefit: public health.
In Canada, a national mandate requires 100% of new vehicle sales to be electric or hybrid by 2035. While climate change is a major driver, the impact on human health could be even more urgent.
Cleaner Air, Healthier Lives
Tailpipe emissions from gas-powered cars release pollutants like nitrogen oxides and fine particulates. These toxins damage lungs, aggravate asthma, and increase cancer risk.
Eliminating tailpipe emissions could transform public health outcomes across cities. According to The Atmospheric Fund, this EV mandate could prevent 11,000 premature deaths and save $90 billion in health-related costs over the next 25 years. That’s not just environmental policy—it’s life-saving action.
Health First, Climate Second?
Bryan Purcell, VP of Policy at The Atmospheric Fund, says the health case is just as strong—if not stronger—than the climate one. “This policy could stand on health benefits alone,” he noted.
Much like how seatbelt laws were once debated but are now essential, EV mandates could follow the same path. They’re designed to protect the public, not just shape markets.
The Real Cost of Pollution
Asthma Canada reports nearly 300 deaths and over 80,000 ER visits annually due to asthma alone. The disease disproportionately affects children, seniors, and communities living near high-traffic zones.
Left unchecked, asthma will cost Canada an estimated $4.2 billion by 2033. And that’s just one health issue tied to vehicle pollution.
Resistance and Rising Momentum
The automotive industry is pushing back. But public health wins often begin with resistance—just look at smoking bans, lead removal, or clean air laws.
Even in the U.S., where EV tax incentives are phasing out, switching to an electric car can still save up to $1,500 annually in gas and maintenance—while reducing exposure to harmful pollutants.
